Cover Image

Feasibility Analysis of PBL Model to Build Student Creativity in Determining pH Route of Natural Indicator

Nafisah Nafisah, Wawan Wahyu, Wahyu Sopandi


Education in the industrial era 4.0 must be adapted to the characteristics and skills of students demanded in the 21st century, one of the skills required is creativity. The data shows that the creativity of students in schools is still relatively low. Learning design must be designed to be able to build student's creativity. This study aims to analyze the feasibility of the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model to build student creativity in determining pH route of natural indicator. The method used in this research is descriptive with DbR design. DbR consists of 4 stages, problem identification and analysis, development prototype, testing and implementation, and reflection. This research was conducted only at the limited trial stage to see the feasibility of the Learning Design using the PBL model to build student creativity. The instruments used in this study were internal feasibility test sheets, external feasibility test sheets, TCOF, and creativity observation sheets. The results showed that the learning design with the PBL model is categorized as very feasible based on internal, external, and TCOF feasibility tests to develop student creativity and student creativity is categorized very well through learning using the PBL model.


Design; Learning; PBL; Creativity

Full Text:



Agustin, N.H., Sarwanto., & Supriyanto, A. (2021). Problem Based Learning on Newton's Law: Can It Improve Student Creativity?. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(4), 528-539.

Akaygun, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2016). STEM Images Revealing STEM Conceptions of Pre-Service Chemistry and Mathematics Teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 56-71.

Alkhaf. (2020). Increasing Student Absorption in Natural Symptoms Materials through the Demonstration Method. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 1(3), 1-13.

Demirhan, E., & Şahin, F. (2019). The Effects of Different Kinds of Hands-on Modeling Activities on the Academic Achievement, Problem-Solving Skills, and Scientific Creativity of Prospective Science Teachers. Research in Science Education, 1-19.

Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2015). The Global Creativity Index 2015. Martin Prosperity Institute, 53–57.

Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?. Educational Psychology Review 16, 235–266.

Kanematsu, H., & Barry, D. M. (2016). STEM and Creativity. STEM and ICT Education in Intelligent Environments, 15-23. Cham:Springer.

KEMENDIKBUD RI. (2013). Permendikbud Nomor 81 A 2013. Implementasi Kurikulum Kurikulum, 1, 1–97.

Kenedi. (2017). Pengembangan Kreativitas Siswa dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Kelas II SMP Nergeri 3 Rokan IV Koto. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Sosial, Sains, Dan Humaniora, 3(2), 329–348.

Lubis, F. A. (2018). Upaya Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa Melalui Model Project Based Learning. PeTeKa, 1(3), 192-201.

McVicker, C. J. (2007). Comic Strips as a Text Structure for Learning to Read. The Reading Teacher, 61(1), 85–88.

Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2009). Some student teachers’ conceptions of creativity in school science. Research in Science and Technological Education, 27(1), 45–60.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States (Appendix F – Science and Engineering Practices). Achieve, Inc. on Behalf of the Twenty-Six States and Partners That Collaborated on the NGSS, November, 1–103.

Pang, W. (2015). Promoting Creativity in The Cassroom: A Generative View. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and The Arts, 9(2), 122-127.

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2007). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Netherlands institute for curriculum development.

Riduwan. (2015). Dasar-dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Semmler, L., & Pietzner, V. (2018). Views of German chemistry teachers on creativity in chemistry classes and in general. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3), 711–731.

Shanahan, M.-C., & Nieswandt, M. (2009). Creative activities and their influence on identification in science: Three case studies. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(3), 63–79.

Silva, A. B. D., Santos, G. T. D., & Bispo, A. C. K. A. (2017). The Comics as Teaching Strategy in Learning of Students in An Undergraduate Management Program. Mackenzie Management Review), 18(1), 40-65.

Sugiyanto, F.N., Masykuri, M., & Muzzazinah. (2018). Analysis of Senior High School Students’ Creative Thinking Skills Profile in Klaten Regency. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1006, 1-6.

Tan, O. S. (2009). Problem-Based Learning and Creativity. Singapore: Cengage Learning.

Wahyu, W., Suryatna, A., Amalia, G. (2019). The Implementation of SSCS (Search-Solve-Create-Share) Model with Worksheet to Build Students’ Creativity on Making Simple Water Purifier in Chemistry Classroom. Unnes Science Education Journal, 8(3), 362-368.

Wahyuni, Sri, et al. (2019). Physics learning devices based on guided inquiry with experiment to improve students’ creativity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012034.

Yusuf, I., Asrifan, A. 2020. Peningkatan Aktivitas Kolaborasi Pembelajaran Fisika Melalui Pendekatan Stem Dengan Purwarupa Pada Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 5 Yogyakarta. Uniqbu Journal of Exact Sciences (UJES), 1(3), 32-48.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Nafisah -

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Publisher: FKIP Universitas Riau