Cover Image

An Analysis of Cogntive and Psychomotor Domains in English Student Textbook of Junior High School

Annisa Annisa, Jismulatif Jismulatif, Dahnilsyah Dahnilsyah

Abstract


This research was conducted in the textbook of 8th grade Junior High School 2013 revision of the 2017 curriculum. The researcher conducted a textbook analysis based on Anderson and Krathwohl's (2001) taxonomic theory of the cognitive domain and Simpson's (1972) psychomotor domain taxonomy to focus more on its relevance to the material in the textbook. This research aims to investigate the representation of cognitive and psychomotor domains in English textbook for the 8th years of Junior High School students with the Core and Basic Competencies of the 2013 curriculum. This research used a content analysis method based on Anderson and Krathwohl theory. The instrument used to collect data in this research was through data observation and document review. The findings of this research reveal that the contents of the book are in accordance with the 2013 revised curriculum syllabus 2017. The results of the research on the cognitive domain showed that it was 100% relevant to the contents of the syllabus and 92.3% of the Psychomotor domain was relevant to the contents of the syllabus.

Keywords


English Textbook; Junior High School; Cognitive; Psychomotor

Full Text:

PDF

References


AbdelWahab, M. M. (2013). Developing an English language textbook evaluative checklist. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(3), 55-70.

Al-Ghazo, A., & MSmadi, O. (2013). A content analysis of the English reading text's authenticity in student's book of action pack eleven in Jordan. European Scientific Journal, 9(29).

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman,.

Azizifar, A., & Baghelani, E. (2014). Textbook evaluation from EFL teachers’ perspectives: The case of “Top-Notch” series. International SAMANM Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 22-41.

Deuri, C. (2012). An evaluative study of text book in English at higher secondary level. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 1(1), 24-28.

Fraenkle, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education.

Garinger, D. (2002). Textbook selection for the ESL classroom. Center for Applied Linguistics Digest, 2(10).

Ghorbani, M. R. (2011). Quantification and graphic representation of EFL textbook evaluation results. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5), 511-520.

Hoover, J. D., & Giambatista, R. C. (2009). Why have we neglected vicarious experiential learning?. In Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference (Vol. 36).

Kasilingam, G., & Chinnavan, E. (2014). Assessment of learning domains to improve student's learning in higher education. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 6(1).

Micklich, D. L. (2011). Examining the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor dimensions in management skill development through experiential learning: developing a framework. In Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference (Vol. 38).

Miekley, J. (2005). ESL textbook evaluation checklist. The reading matrix, 5(2).

Poerwati, L. E., & Amri, S. (2013). Panduan memahami kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Priyatni, E. T. (2014). Desain pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia dalam kurikulum 2013. Bumi Aksara.

Sitepu, B. P. (2012). Penulisan buku teks pelajaran [Writing the textbooks]. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Tarigan, H. G., & Tarigan, D. (1990). Telaah buku tekst bahasa Indonesia. Angkasa.

Wen-Cheng, W., Chien-Hung, L., & Chung-Chieh, L. (2011). Thinking of the Textbook in the ESL/EFL Classroom. English language teaching, 4(2), 91-96.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jes.5.3.p.502-510

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Annisa Annisa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Publisher: FKIP Universitas Riau